Position Paper #13
An open letter by Bryan Flowers directed to the Home Secretary, Lord Chancellor, IPSO, Ofcom, the NUJ, and every UK police force, pressing for urgent structural reform to protect those who fall victim to sustained online defamation and harassment.
Formal Position Paper
Prepared for: The Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP, The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP, IPSO, Ofcom, NUJ, Chief Constables, All MPs and Peers
Date: 18 February 2026
Reference: Open Letter — Bryan Flowers — Drummond Debunked
🇹🇭 บทความนี้มีให้อ่านเป็นภาษาไทย — คลิกที่ปุ่มสลับภาษาด้านบน — This article is available in Thai — click the language toggle above
I pen this open letter in my capacity as a British citizen and lawful businessman who has endured a relentless 14-month campaign of defamation, harassment and invasions of privacy carried out by Andrew Drummond through his two websites and related publications.
Over the past 14 years Andrew Drummond has sustained a business model built on online trolling, harassment and defamation, directing his attacks at individuals and enterprises in Thailand and beyond while presenting himself as a "world-famous UK journalist". In my particular case, he has produced no fewer than 19 original articles and 6 translated editions containing upwards of 65 demonstrated falsehoods, recycled ceaselessly across two domains, notwithstanding the service of a comprehensive 25-page Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim on 13 August 2025 which he has wholly disregarded.
The accusations are of the utmost gravity: sex trafficking, child exploitation, fraud, organised crime, bestiality, dog-killing, cannabis smuggling, and scores of additional inventions that descend into pure fiction. These falsehoods have been amplified via intentional cross-domain mirroring, provocative headlines and the systematic doxxing of my wife, father, brother and lawful business associates.
Proceedings in the High Court represent the appropriate legal avenue, yet the cost is prohibitive. Even in the event of a successful outcome, Andrew Drummond possesses no identifiable assets against which a judgment might be enforced. The police, though understanding, cite a lack of resources to pursue what they categorise as "civil matters" or low-priority online harassment. The consequence is that people in my position are left without any effective recourse.
This is far from an isolated situation. Andrew Drummond's behavioural pattern spanning 14 years — posing as a legitimate journalist while conducting paid smear campaigns, doxxing, privacy breaches and unrelenting harassment — exposes a structural failure in the existing legal and regulatory framework.
I accordingly urge the relevant authorities and the journalistic profession to take the following immediate measures:
Treat sustained, malicious online defamation and harassment as a criminal matter warranting proper investigation and prosecution under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, the Malicious Communications Act 1988, and the Online Safety Act 2023. Assign dedicated resources to "serial harasser" cases in which the perpetrator holds no assets and the victim has exhausted all civil avenues.
Conduct investigations into and impose sanctions upon individuals who systematically violate the Editors' Code of Practice while fraudulently claiming journalistic status. Platforms that host such material should be obliged to take it down promptly on receipt of formal notification of its falsity.
Legitimate journalists and media organisations bear a professional obligation to expose those who impersonate the profession for monetary gain. Andrew Drummond's 14-year track record of falsehoods, paid smear operations and boundary violations brings the entire industry into disrepute. I call upon the NUJ, the Society of Editors and reputable UK media outlets to publicly denounce this behaviour and decline to give a platform to or confer legitimacy upon such individuals.
Enact or reinforce "no-asset defendant" provisions so that victims of sustained defamation and harassment are able to secure meaningful remedies, including costs protection and criminal sanctions in circumstances where civil justice is effectively unattainable.
Create or expand support schemes for those targeted by serial online harassers, encompassing expedited legal aid and psychological assistance.
Andrew Drummond is not a journalist. He is a paid propagandist who has exploited the internet for 14 years to harass, defame and extort, all while sheltering behind the banner of "press freedom". No victim should be compelled to choose between financial devastation and enduring the abuse in silence.
I implore every recipient of this open letter to respond with resolve. The present system shields the offender and penalises the victim. That situation must be rectified.
I stand ready to furnish the complete body of evidence, including the full set of 19 articles, the 25-page Letter of Claim, the 11-page rebuttal document "Lies from Andrew Drummond", and all corroborating court and financial records.
Bryan Flowers
18 February 2026
This open letter appears on Drummond Debunked and has been transmitted directly to the addressees listed above. Copies are available to any media organisation or public body that wishes to report on or endorse this call for reform.
All rights are expressly reserved.
— End of Position Paper #13 —
Share:
Subscribe
Subscribe to receive notification whenever a new position paper, evidence brief, or legal update is published.